What Is a Current Limiting Reactor and How Does It Protect Your Power System?

September 29, 2026 | By Chris Wang  

High-voltage outdoor current limiting reactors installed in an industrial substation for power system protection.

LTECPower outdoor current limiting reactor installation

A current limiting reactor (CLR) is a series-connected reactor that helps protect power systems by reducing prospective short-circuit current. It adds inductive reactance to the circuit, increasing fault-path impedance and reducing the fault current downstream equipment sees.

So, when does your power system need one, where should it be installed, and how do you select the right reactor? Let’s break it down.

1. What Is a Current Limiting Reactor?

A current limiting reactor is an inductive device connected in series with an electrical circuit to increase its reactance and limit the current that can flow during a short circuit.

Unlike a circuit breaker, the reactor does not interrupt the fault. Instead, it restricts the magnitude of the prospective fault current so that downstream equipment is exposed to a lower fault duty.

Manufacturing view of current limiting reactor coils and insulators in an industrial factory setting.

LTECPower factory indoor current limiting reactor assembly

This distinction is important:

DevicePrimary Function
Current Limiting ReactorLimits the magnitude of fault current
Circuit BreakerInterrupts and clears fault current

Current limiting reactors are particularly relevant in medium-voltage and high-capacity distribution systems where available short-circuit current has become an equipment or system-design concern.

2. When Does a Power System Need a Current Limiting Reactor?

A current limiting reactor becomes worth evaluating when the available fault current is higher than desired for the equipment or system configuration.

You May Need a Current Limiting Reactor If:

Your Situation

Why It Matters

Fault current approaches equipment ratings

Switchgear and other equipment may face excessive fault duty

A new transformer is added

Additional source capacity can increase available short-circuit current

Transformers operate in parallel

Parallel sources can increase the fault level

A generator or new source is connected

The additional source may contribute fault current

Plant or substation capacity is expanded

Existing equipment may have been selected for a lower original fault level

Two bus sections are interconnected

Fault current can be contributed from both sides of the system

A CLR should not be selected simply because the system is “large.” The first step is to determine the available fault current through a short-circuit study and compare the results with the applicable equipment ratings.

3. How Does a Current Limiting Reactor Reduce Short-Circuit Current?

The basic principle is straightforward.

A simplified relationship for fault current is:

Isc ≈ V/Z

Where:

Isc = prospective short-circuit current

V = system voltage

Z = total impedance of the fault-current path

Without a reactor:

Ztotal = Zsource + Ztransformer + Zsystem

After adding a current limiting reactor:

Ztotal = Zsource + Ztransformer + Zsystem + Zreactor

The additional reactor impedance increases the total impedance seen by the fault.

Higher fault-path impedance → Lower prospective short-circuit current

This is the fundamental operating principle of a current limiting reactor. Distribution-system studies have shown that series reactors effectively reduce calculated short-circuit current. 

4. Where Is a Current Limiting Reactor Installed?

The location of the reactor determines which part of the system receives the fault-current-limiting effect.

Common configurations include:

Feeder Reactor

Bus → Current Limiting Reactor → Feeder → Load

Used to limit fault-current contribution into an individual feeder.

Bus-Tie Reactor

Bus A → Current Limiting Reactor → Bus B

Used between bus sections to limit fault-current transfer and help localize the effect of a fault on either bus.

Transformer Circuit

Transformer → Current Limiting Reactor → Distribution Bus

May be considered where the transformer/source contribution produces an excessive downstream fault level.

Generator or Source Connection

Generator / Source → Current Limiting Reactor → Bus

May be used where an additional source contributes excessive fault current to the common system.

Feeder and bus-tie reactors are established current-limiting applications, and the best installation point depends on where fault-current reduction is actually required. 

5. What Does a Current Limiting Reactor Protect?

High short-circuit currents create both thermal and mechanical stresses in electrical equipment.

By reducing the prospective fault-current magnitude, a properly engineered current limiting reactor can reduce the fault duty imposed on equipment downstream of the reactor, including:

  • Circuit breakers
  • Switchgear
  • Busbars
  • Transformers
  • Cables
  • Other downstream distribution equipment

This does not mean the reactor prevents the fault from occurring.

Its purpose is to control the magnitude of current during the fault until the protection system isolates the affected circuit.

Series current-limiting reactors themselves must also be designed for the thermal and mechanical short-circuit duty they may experience. 

6. More Reactance Is Not Always Better

If additional reactance reduces short-circuit current, it may seem logical to simply use as much reactor impedance as possible.

That is not good engineering practice.

The reactor remains in the power circuit during normal operation, so its impedance can also affect normal system performance.

Increasing Reactor Impedance Can…

But May Also…

Reduce prospective fault current

Increase voltage drop

Reduce downstream fault duty

Affect voltage regulation

Reduce short-circuit stress

Affect motor starting or large-load performance

Help control system fault level

Add losses and other system-design considerations

This is why reactor selection should begin with the system study rather than with an arbitrary impedance percentage.

7. Air-Core vs. Iron-Core Current Limiting Reactors

Core construction is particularly important in fault-current-limiting applications because the reactor must maintain sufficient reactance when current rises sharply during a fault.

Air-Core Current Limiting Reactor

Air-core current limiting reactors displayed outside an industrial manufacturing facility.

LTECPower air core current limiting reactor yard

An air-core reactor has no ferromagnetic core and therefore avoids magnetic-core saturation. This allows its inductance/reactance characteristics to remain more predictable at high fault currents.

For this reason, air-core construction is widely associated with current-limiting applications. 

Iron-Core Current Limiting Reactor

Product view of an iron-core current limiting reactor with insulation column for power systems.

LTECPower iron core current limiting reactor

Iron-core designs can also be engineered for current-limiting applications, including designs that use air gaps to increase the saturation level. However, magnetic saturation must be considered carefully because loss of effective inductance during high-current conditions would reduce the desired current-limiting effect. 

Design Factor

Air-Core

Iron-Core

Inductance under high current

Not affected by core saturation

Depends on magnetic design

External magnetic field

Requires installation clearance consideration

Depends on core/construction

Selection

Application-specific

Application-specific

The choice should be based on voltage, rated current, required reactance, fault duty, installation space, magnetic clearance, environment, and project requirements rather than core type alone.

8. How Do You Select a Current Limiting Reactor?

A current limiting reactor cannot be selected from system voltage alone.

The manufacturer needs to understand both the normal operating condition and the fault duty the reactor must withstand.

Before Requesting a Current Limiting Reactor, Prepare:

Parameter

Why It Matters

System voltage

Determines system and insulation requirements    

Rated continuous current

Determines continuous current capability

System frequency

Typically 50 Hz or 60 Hz

Existing short-circuit current

Defines the present fault level 

Target short-circuit current

Defines the required current limitation

Required reactance/impedance

Used when already determined by the system study

Short-time current and duration

Defines thermal and mechanical fault duty   

Insulation level / BIL

Required for insulation coordination

Indoor/outdoor installation

Affects mechanical and environmental design

Ambient and installation conditions

Temperature, altitude, clearances, and enclosure conditions may affect design

Short-circuit withstand is particularly important: series current-limiting reactors require defined thermal and mechanical short-circuit ratings, and the required duration should reflect the system protection and breaker clearing behavior. 

If you do not yet know the required reactor impedance, provide the system information and short-circuit study data rather than estimating it.

9. Example: Plant Expansion Increases the Fault Level

Consider a factory with an existing medium-voltage distribution system:

Utility → Transformer → MV Bus → Loads

The original short-circuit level is within the ratings of the installed switchgear.

Later, the plant expands and adds another transformer or generation source:

Source 1 + Source 2 → MV Bus → Loads

The additional source contribution increases the available fault current at the bus.

If the calculated fault duty becomes too high for the intended system design, one engineering option may be to introduce additional series reactance at an appropriate location:

Source → Current Limiting Reactor → MV Bus

The reactor increases the impedance between the source and the fault, reducing the prospective short-circuit current seen downstream.

This does not mean a current limiting reactor is automatically the correct solution for every expansion project.

The required approach—and the reactor impedance, if one is used—should be determined from the actual network and short-circuit study.

10. Is a Current Limiting Reactor Right for Your System?

A current limiting reactor is designed for a specific type of electrical problem.

Consider Evaluating a CLR When:

✓ Available short-circuit current is too high

✓ System expansion has increased the fault level

✓ Existing equipment fault ratings are a concern

✓ Fault-current transfer between bus sections needs to be limited

✓ A system study identifies additional series impedance as an appropriate solution

A Current Limiting Reactor Is Not the Same Solution for:

✕ Harmonic distortion

✕ Capacitor-bank resonance

✕ Low power factor

✕ Reactive power compensation

✕ Every type of overcurrent problem

Those conditions may require different equipment such as harmonic filters, detuned reactors, power capacitors, or reactive power compensation systems.

The first step is therefore to identify the actual electrical problem before selecting the reactor.

Conclusion

Current limiting reactor selection depends on the complete power system, not simply the voltage or current printed on the nameplate.

For a technical evaluation, provide:

System Voltage 

Rated Current 

Frequency 

Existing Short-Circuit Current 

Target Fault Current 

Required Reactance (if known) 

Short-Time Current/Duration 

Installation Conditions

LTECPower can evaluate the reactor requirements against your application and provide a current limiting reactor configuration based on the project parameters.

[View Medium Voltage Current Limiting Reactors]

[Request Technical Evaluation]

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of a current limiting reactor?

A current limiting reactor adds series reactance to an electrical circuit to reduce prospective short-circuit current. Its purpose is to help keep fault-current levels within the requirements of the power system and downstream equipment.

The reactor increases the impedance in the fault-current path. For a given system voltage, increasing the total circuit impedance reduces the prospective fault current. The required reactor reactance should be determined from the actual system short-circuit study.

Typical locations include feeders, bus ties, transformer/source circuits, and generator connections. The correct location depends on where fault-current contribution needs to be limited. 

Selection normally considers system voltage, continuous current, existing and target short-circuit current, required reactance, short-time current and duration, insulation level, and installation conditions. It should be based on the actual power-system study rather than a generic percentage.

No. A current limiting reactor limits the magnitude of prospective fault current, while a circuit breaker interrupts the current and isolates the faulted circuit. They perform different functions within the protection system. 

Keep Learning

50 Hz vs 60 Hz Power Systems: Key Differences

Navigating the differences between 50 Hz and 60 Hz power grids is essential for international equipment sourcing. This comprehensive guide breaks down the physics, history, and core engineering risks—such as motor speed drops and transformer magnetic saturation—while providing actionable solutions to keep your global machinery running safely.